Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Jesper De Jong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jul at 12:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ugo Carabelli vs J. De Jong

ARG
3
Win
Played
4
Win

NED
3
Win
Played
4
Win
Head-to-head: Carabelli 3 - 4 Jong
They have played 16 sets in total, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli winning 7 and Jesper De Jong winning 9. The last match between Jesper De Jong and Camilo Ugo Carabelli was at the Nordea Open - Bastad, 19-07-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-3 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carabelli | 3 |
| Jong | 4 |
Last 7 H2H Matches:
(SF) Nordea Open - Bastad(07-19-25)
(F) Villa Maria Challenger(10-13-24)
(Q3) Australian Open - Melbourne(01-12-24)
C. U. Carabelli vs J. D. Jong H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $639,320 | Career Prize Money | $1,079,930 |
| 62.40% (380-229) | Career Total W/L | 61.80% (288-178) |
| 3 | Clay | 3 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 12 | Titles | 7 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 43.18% (19-25) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.84% (17-14) |
C. U. Carabelli vs J. D. Jong Match Preview:
- In recent matches, Jong has a slightly better second serve win rate at 46.66% compared to Carabelli’s 45.19%.
- Carabelli leads in recent return games, winning 47.57% of points on opponents' second serves, while Jong has a 42.96% win rate.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Carabelli again has an edge, capturing 29.02% of these points, while Jong manages 24.11%.
- Under pressure, Jong has secured 56.55% of breakpoints, a slight advantage over Carabelli's 54.36%.
- Over the past year, Carabelli has had a higher match-winning percentage at 64.1%, compared to Jong's 58.57%.
- Jong prefers playing on Hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Carabelli excels on Clay surfaces, winning 65% of matches.
- Both players have achieved a split in their head-to-head matches, each winning three of their six encounters.
- Carabelli faced slightly higher-ranked opponents on average over the last year, with an average rank of 164.6 compared to Jong's 177.66.
- Carabelli seems more proficient in deciding sets, winning 74% of them, while Jong has a 52% win rate in these situations.
- Break point conversion highlights Carabelli’s efficiency at 33.7%, compared to Jong’s 29.15%.
Editorial Prediction (July 19, 2025, UTC):
The stats reveal a nuanced battle between Jong and Carabelli, with each player displaying unique strengths. Jong demonstrates a slightly better efficiency in second serve points but struggles more in the return game compared to Carabelli.
Carabelli shows a stronger performance on return games and excels in clay environments, which can be pivotal given the surface. His improved breakpoint conversion and deciding set statistics further reinforce his competitiveness under pressure.
Based on recent performances, surface preference, and ability to handle high-pressure situations, Carabelli appears to have a slight edge, making him the likely winner in this upcoming face-off.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Jesper De Jong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. U. Carabelli vs J. D. Jong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 4 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 9 |
| 77 | Games Won | 83 |
| 26 | Aces (Total) | 23 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 21 |
| 1:53:24 | Average Match Time | 1:53:24 |
| 61% (325/529) | 1st Serve % | 60% (299/497) |
| 66% (216/325) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (220/299) |
| 49% (99/204) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (92/198) |
| 43% (18/42) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (21/47) |
| 37% (185/497) | Return Points Win % | 40% (214/529) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. U. Carabelli Recent Matches Played
J. D. Jong Recent Matches Played

C. U. Carabelli vs J. D. Jong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.40% (380/229) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.80% (288/178) |
| 59.23% (834/574) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.46% (641/437) |
| 53.58% (6986/6052) | Games Win/Loss | 54.13% (5567/4717) |
| 50.68% (37/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (94/47) |
| 64.95% (341/184) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.45% (165/91) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.10% (23/28) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 1144 | Aces Total | 2012 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1357 | Total Double Faults | 1225 |
| 1:41:36 | Average Match Time | 1:41:13 |
| 371.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 382.02 |
| 62% (24524/39653) | 1st Serve % | 60% (19117/31871) |
| 66% (16262/24524) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (13467/19117) |
| 50% (7496/15128) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6492/12754) |
| 45% (2062/4586) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1419/3373) |
| 43% (17156/40178) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13212/32228) |
| 36.36% (8/14) | Slam W/L | 60.98% (25/16) |
| 41.67% (10/14) | Masters W/L | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Main Tour W/L | 47.92% (23/25) |
| 65.52% (190/100) | Challenger W/L | 60.48% (127/83) |
| 66.97% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 69.08% (105/47) |
| 63% (368/582) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (274/442) |
| 41% (7/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 53% (83/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (87/168) |
| 60% (109/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (74/139) |
| 89% (351/311) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (281/247) |
| 11% (351/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (281/34) |
| 26% (257/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (185/39) |